BACK to site navigation

BACK to list of material pertaining to creation

CREATION#10

The big bang theory of the creation of the universe is not the beginning of the universe at all but an attempt to understand the behaviour of particles after creation. The beginning of the universe is synonymous with the creation of the original fundamental particles and their subsequent behaviour. It is hardly likely that having created particles in a particular way that the creator should give up the formula and go for a twentieth century solution to everything by blowing it all up. What evidence in nature is there for a big bang as a formula. Nature does things gently and with precision when she creates. She destroys dramatically and sometimes explosively but only to put something else in its place. At the beginning of the universe there was no space for a big bang to extend into because space didn’t exist and there was nothing to destroy so why a big bang, why should the creator have a nervous breakdown before he or she though anything to get nervous about?

No, the big bang theory is nothing more than an attempt to interpret creation in terms of 20th century barbarism. Science regards fundamental particles as inanimate and without life. Religion has given up any hope of understanding anything. Occult philosophy requires that everything is alive and in a constant state of change even if that change is nothing more than being in a different part of the universe. Has anyone ever explained to anybody’s satisfaction why atoms join together to form molecules. The occult view is that everything no matter how primitive has a will to be and if in the attainment of that being joining together with others of the same nature helps in that particle’s expression of itself it will join with others whether it be a proton neutron electron or a man woman or child, the principle is always the same if it appears in nature then the more important the function is the more likely it is to extend macrocosmically and microcosmically.