BACK to site navigation

BACK to list of material pertaining to creation

CREATION#17

The way we understand the world is reflected in the way we run the world. The primary idea propounded by Freud and others that the whole thing is based on sex has led to dualistic systems at all points of society.

Democracy, a two party system derives from this male female concept. Science works on the same principle + added to - = ± i.e. 2H2O + O2 = 2H2O. This easy view of things is changing, too may things are refusing to fit into the pattern.

There are two fundamental principles at the roots of western society, creation and reproduction. It could be said that science is the religion of reproduction and religion is the science of creation. Newtonian physics and Einsteinian maths say that all actions have a reaction, cause and effect cannot deal with creation whether it be of the universe or the first particle in creation.

The religious view: Judeo-Christianity in Genesis seems obscure and does not deal with how it was actually done. Kabbalistic Jews may not agree with this statement but even they must agree that Ain and Ain Soph are a bit of a get-out when describing nothing. To find out what the physics of creation is according to Christianity we must look to the birth of Christ himself; after all it must take a similar formula to create the universe. God wouldn’t incarnate his son in any lesser way than by the formula required to create the whole shebang in the first place. If we reduce the birth of Christ to mathematical concepts we get the Virgin Mary and the Holy Ghost, two females and therefore negatives, God as a stable positive. He is stable because if he was unstable he wouldn’t need a son in the first place. And the son himself who must be an unstable positive, if he had been stable he would have kept his mouth shut.

Taking this concept still further and including the ideas in the Gnostic Gospels about creation being a feminine process we get Zero dividing into two negatives, Holy Ghost and Virgin Mary, which unite to create a stable positive, God, and an unstable positive, Jesus. Or, Zero splits into two negatives particles which combine to create a proton and an unstable proton. The unstable proton desires to return to the pure Zero state hence Christ’s admonishment to be good i.e. return to the neutral state. This unstable proton contains all possibility and thus creates the universe.

This original Zero state is reflected in everything in their tendency to spin. Theories involving tiny particles (Christ) attracting other particles to them until the whole system begins to spin (Zero) and create a Sun illustrates the process quite well. From this hypothesis everything can be explained from the alternating current to the creation of the Sun.

We need a new physics. there is no way in Newtonian physics or Einsteinian maths to beam Scotty up. If we are to transcend space and time we must have a negotiable Zero, a concept not present in old style physics.

Homeopathy illustrates what happens next. Homeopathy takes advantage of the creation principle. The unstable positive particle has the capacity to obsess a medium just as in homeopathy one creates the most effective remedy by reducing the active ingredient to nothing more than an idea. Nuclear physics works by a similar method using an energised neutron which by its activity alone defines it more as an unstable proton. If the neutron was truly neutral it would act like a neutrino and pass through everything, the very fact that it has mass and can be accelerated indicates that it is no longer neutral but must hold a charge that transcends the rules of physics that apply to all the other members of a chain reaction. The neutron is the Jesus particle or an unstable proton. It is this particle in the nucleus of an atom that keeps the whole thing stable by constantly changing its orbit to cope with existing conditions. This has given rise to the appearance of countless effects which have been described as other particles but this isn’t so. The atom consist of the Spin (Zero), positive and negative particles and the unstable positive.

Politically speaking a society based on this creation hypothesis would be hierarchical and not dualistic, dependent on abstract deities not expediency. Democracy requires two parties + and -. Communism requires two parties the State and the people. The first can survive but is not good for the medium (environment) in which it is placed as it is exploitationary. The second (Communism) cannot survive as it polarises the people against the state and must fall apart. The third possibility requires a recognition of how things come into being and how that state is maintained, and imitated as closely as possible on the principle that what is good enough for the universe is good enough for us. The trouble with this approach is that it has already been done, 5000 years ago in Egypt: and what is worse, the better the society produced the nearer it gets to its own demise or Zero point! But we are dealing in thousands of years of progressive stability rather than the few years of vested opportunism that we have at present. The nearest political system to this was National Socialism in Germany. If Hitler had harnessed the genius and conservatism of his Jews instead of seeking to annihilate them then it is conceivable that we would have a very interesting world today.

Dualism is always introspective and never progressive. Dualism creates a system where ultimately ‘‘progress’’ becomes a dirty word and all man’s genius is reduced to ‘‘what will it cost and will it see a profit.’’ Profit and loss - positive and negative. Unstable positive - unlimited progress. Base your system on materialism or polarity and you get boom and bust and war. Base your system on Christianity and you get stable progress.

The genius of Christianity is that it is a feminist philosophy propounded by a man, it must be because of our original formula. Whichever way you put it God couldn’t make Jesus, it took two females to do it therefore the nature of Christ must not be his father which is stable but his mother’s which is unstable and feminine. If we examine the tenets of Christianity its emphasis of feminine values is obvious.