BACK to site navigation

BACK to list of material pertaining to creation

CREATION#8

The Scientific view of the creation of the universe is that it all started off with a big bang, a sort of Izzy Wizzy let’s get busy sort of creation. The Big Bang theory of creation of the universe is typical of 20th century barbaric thinking. It works on the principle of, we don’t know what happened so let’s blow it up. Nothing in nature to my knowledge begins with a big bang events quite often end with a big bang particularly in the aforementioned century but they don’t begin. These views are at odds with present scientific ‘‘thought’’ but then I’m not a scientist well at least not any more, I was once but that’s another story, now I’m an occultist and to begin something with a bang when there is no time nor space for a big bang to occur in strikes me as unscientific. The beginning of things must have been a pretty spectacular event - something from nothing.

You’d think that the deity having figured out a way to get things started would use the same formula to keep things going, this seems reasonable to me. The creation of things from nothing must still be around with us now because the creation is still going on all around us it hasn’t stopped admittedly there are bits of the universe that get bored and bland out as in the case of entropy but generally speaking the show seems to be well and truly on the road. Then there is the religious view, everything was created in seven days including God’s day off, but what seven days? What sun to measure seven days with? I think God was cheating a bit someone had got there before him and made the sun earth and sleep and all those whacky concepts that populate that macho edited text ‘the Bible’. Nope by the time God got in on the act there were already lots of toys to play with that look as if they don’t get a mention. Knowing God’s track record I think I know why he kept quiet about who did the real work. It strikes me that the reason God kept mum was that all the real graft of setting things up was done by a female and God was never very keen on females. In fact wherever God pops up whether as Allah or Jehovah woman comes in for some stick - hmmmmm.

However getting back to the main thrust of my argument. If you are going to create or incarnate a God there are very good reasons why you should do it in such a way as to initiate the creation of the universe to establish your credentials at least. You know ‘I created the universe and I’m going to produce a Son in the same way just to show you how clever I am. So here goes...’ He gets these two females The Holy Spirit, Venus by any other name and a virgin woman two females, why can’t God do it himself on the Izzy Wizzy principle? Why involve these two women after all God isn’t keen on women he’s had some pretty bad experiences from them. The only answer I can think of is that these females were superior to him oh horror of horrors. God wouldn’t use women unless he had no other choice and having produced Jesus by these two women surely he should have realised that genetically he should have represented the female point of view not the male, could be Jesus was keen on everybody loving one another and being symbolised by a fish, sounds a bit less than the sort of John Wayne type God that we have all come to know and suspect and a bit more like a woman’s handiwork. Two females or put scientifically two negative particles produced, through love a positive particle that is God +. It strikes me that God felt a bit hen pecked and asked these Goddesses, electrons or whatever to give him a son another male to play with and they complied because they were that kind of people.

In maths and physics this is sound enough -x-=+, but for some reason or another they produced an unstable positive particle or God or proton so we have for our creation story Nothing dividing into two negatives, Goddesses, particles who cares these in their turn produce a positive particle and an unstable positive particle. It is this unstable proton that is responsible for the kicking off of space and time, imperfection had appeared. Put graphically: O...upper and lower arcs...=...+...Calvary cross. I like this neat symbol for the unstable proton - a Calvary cross an unbalanced cross. Well folks you don’t have to look very far for the evidence of this being a good system. It’s the way light, electricity, and all the other bits and pieces move. Two negative particles produce a positive and an unstable positive and this in its turn drags the two negatives also.