BACK to site navigation

BACK to list of material pertaining to creation

CREATION#9

It is silly to suggest that the universe was created from a big bang because without space and time there was nothing to have a big bang in. One must first produce a theory for how space and time began. In the beginning there must have been absolutely nothing, a concept that can only be poetical because there is no concept in science that can delineate nothing. The origin of the universe can only ever be described poetically because at the creation of the universe only poetry existed. Nothing and a poem, that poem was what nothing was. Nothing must contain all possibility. A concept of Zero that is foreign to science and yet is the cornerstone of mystical systems like Hinduism and Judaism. Nothing divided itself. To ancient and emerging man nothing was a Goddess. This nothing divided into two nothings or two Goddesses Isis and Nepthys or Eve and Lilith etc. O=()= --. It is agreed in most forms of mysticism that they divided for another factor - Love which can be loosely defined as the tendency to unite through similarity or singularity.

In physics and maths if you multiply a negative by a negative you get a positive. To suggest that physical laws existed at the moment of creation is silly because there was nothing to define these laws. It is as silly to say that there were scientific laws as it is to say that the origin of creation according to the Bible can be true. If in the beginning there was nothing then there would still be nothing unless that nothing had a tendency to be something other than nothing. This suggests that nothing must have some quality or property which is a contradiction in terms and yet it must be true. The ultimate divinity must have been nothing with the possibility of becoming something in which case the ultimate Zero is in a perpetual state of becoming and that is as close to the beginning of things that you can get. If nothing is to become something that something must still have the quality of nothing or the complete absence of phenomena that is negativity. Only poetry can exist at this point. Phenomena and the rule of law do not exist only nothing and the potentiality to be less than nothing - negativity.

The negative to the minds of the ancients was a Goddess. They regarded everything as being alive. All science to them involved living entities. All things lived and either had a benefic or a malefic influence. The beginning and creation are always described in terms of living beings. Thus nothing the supreme Goddess divided herself for some reason or another. That reason must have been very simple and yet capable of the greatest complexity. That something is Love. The power of Love is reflected in mankind today. Humanity does everything for love of something or other. Love is intrinsic to the nature of creation. It is the basis of reproduction and manifestation. The

Goddess divided for love’s sake into two further Goddesses both having a negative charge. These two Goddesses united again to produce a third force -x-=+ a fact celebrated today in science two negatives produce a positive a fact that is basic to all scientific processes - two Goddesses produce a God. Now you have the possibility of a big bang. The expansion outwards of - - and + in Nothing. This concept of two Goddesses creating a God or two negatives creating a positive is intrinsic to all creation myths.

Having created a positive or a God, the God eventually complained to the Goddesses that he was alone and lonely. So the Goddesses united their negativity again. Their Yonis kissed. A phenomena that is celebrated to this day kissing of mouths between man and woman too is a reflection of the original kiss of two Yonis. This kiss produced a child. The two Goddesses have been variously described - in Christianity they are the Virgin Mary and the Holy Ghost. The Son has the same nature of the father because his mothers were of the same nature. The Child is Christ. When you really think about Christ as the word or Logos his nature and message is that of a woman’s yoni if it could speak. This later force Christ delineated through his life the nature of the experience that must be undergone by all that lives.

To recap we have O which becomes ( ) = -&- then -x- =+ and -+- =+. Note that the irrefutable law that positives cannot ever produce a negative but negatives give positives in physics and maths-x-=+-x+=-+x+=+ One must examine physics that is what we know to explain what we don’t know. To posit a creation without characteristics as science tries to do is clearly silly because nothing would always remain nothing. For the tendency for nothing to become something requires poetry and poetry suggests desire. It is not possible to ever comprehend this original nothing we can only partake of the nature of it becoming something. To comprehend nothing we must become nothing. Mystics have attempted this state but have only ever underpinned modern physics by the statements they make. Nobody has ever either physically through science or poetically through mysticism, nobody has ever comprehended the ultimate nature of Nothing.

Incidentally creation is an ongoing phenomenon. The universe is continually in a state of becoming that is why all the ancient names of God JEHOVAH EHEIEH in Hebrew, ALLA in Arabic etc all express the intention of the will ‘‘to be’’. They all mean ‘‘I WILL BE’’. No name of god says I AM. All ancient ideas of the supreme being resume the concept of becoming rather than being. Physics agrees with this concept therefore the creation is an ongoing process that is reflected in all that lives. The reproductive cycle of woman is a reflection of the cycle of creation expressed in the life and death and meaning of Christ the yoni of woman in the law of love that must be obeyed. The absence of the blood of woman to the ancients gave a child therefore the blood of Christ redeemed mankind. The modern ideas of chaos must ultimately have its source as the menstrual bleed of woman. This was the original chaos.

The Book of the Law delineates a continuous creation in which we incarnate and disincarnate only to reincarnate again and again but there is no grace or guilt involved in the process. It is simply an expression of the will to be. We live forever. It is not possible to divide the supreme entity from her creation. To say that in the beginning there was a deity and something that was not the supreme deity is absurd because that supreme deity could not be supreme if there was something else to challenge that supremacy. No! in the beginning was God or Goddess and that deity had the potential to be everything and the universe is that everything. It is NOT possible to separate the Goddess from what she created. The creator and the created must be one. That means that the supreme deity is at once the creation and everything contained within it. Any antagonistic forces within creation must be subject to that original will. Viewed from one lifetime human experience can only be described as catastrophic. Viewed from the standpoint of eternity and eternal reincarnation life human experience can be nothing more than poetic and that poem is the illusion of our independent life. Like the light tips on a fibre optic lamp we think we are one independent spark of light but our source is in the llight that sustains us all, the light of the sun. This light is a symbol of the one light of creation. From nothing it creates hydrogen H+ this is its turn creates helium, God and the Son of God but all this occurs in space. All things that contain are feminine, such as space, the sea etc and all things that are contained are considered children of space or whatever. Thus the Goddess created everything including man and man continually seeks to reunite with that original woman. This is the source of all the incest myths including Isis and Horus (Set). This is a desire on the part of man to return to the original positive state of +x-=-. Man is nothing more than a dream of the Goddess using all her attributes of pleasure. The penis is nothing more than an elongated clitoris. In ancient mystery schools it was said that the genitals of a woman were a kiss of the Goddess imprinted between her legs. Her lips remain imprinted between the legs of woman and the female nature of everything is celebrated in that act of love ‘‘the kiss’’. When you look at a woman’s sex you must realise that it was designed primarily to kiss another woman’s sex in the formula -x-=+ the formula of how the alternating current works.